Reconciling data

UB-SPES have used vocabulariets/concept schemes/registries from the very start. From card catalogues to controlled strings and SKOS Concepts. The data is available in the UB-SPES SPARQL endpoint and the concept schemes are available at marcus.uib.no/conceptschemes. “Løvetann emneregister” is also included.

Status of the concept schemes

1. Arabisk emneordregister
   • Integrate in bigger schema?
2. Sudansamlingens stedsregister
   • Remove as it is not a concept scheme?
3. Språksamlinganes emneordregister
   • Integrate in bigger schema?
4. Nordlandshandelens arkiv - Typologitermer
   • Detailed and well maintained, integrate in form/genre schema?
5. Diplomsamlingens autoritetsregister
   • Mostly places and some concepts. Integrate in bigger schema?
6. Elektronisk litteratur emneregister
   • Integrate in bigger schema.
7. test-manlib
   • Remove as it is not a concept scheme? Test for cleaning up the next schema?
8. Manuskript- og librarsamlingens autoritetsregister
   • Persons, places and concepts. Often about the same “thing”. Integrate in bigger schema? Clean up and map to HumOrd?
9. Sudansamlingens autoritetsregister over familier og slekter (nisba)
   • Remove as it is not a concept scheme? Use Set to group things as this?
10. Sudansamlingens aktørregister
    • Remove as it is not a concept scheme? Use Set to group things as this?
11. Monumenter i Bergen
    • Use Set to group things as this? Should be finished, as Tarje and Irene only got halfway around bergen.
12. Billedsamlingens emneord
    • In good shape. Merge with KulturNav concept scheme based on this one?
13. Fagregister 1927-1928
    • Ok, as it uses old terms? Integrate in bigger schema?
14. Knudsen områder
    • Keep as it catches Knud Knudsens areas of interest and place names in Norway at the time.
15. Løvetann emneord
    • Part of the journal “Løvetann” and should be kept as such?

Workflow

NB!: JSON representation of registries is not currently available!